SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

D.K.JAIN, VINAY KUMAR, M.SHREESHA
Geeta Devi – Appellant
Versus
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


ORDER

M. Shreesha, Member—In this Revision Petition, under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short the “Act”), the Complainant questions the correctness and legality of the order passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan (for short the ‘State Commission”) in Appeal No. 1900 of 2008. By the impugned order, the State Commission allowed the Appeal and set aside the order of the District Consumer Protection Forum, Sirohi (for short “the District Forum”) in CC No. 25 of 2007. By its order, the District Forum, allowed the complaint and directed the Insurance Company to pay the insured amount of Rs.2,00,000/- together with compensation of Rs.5,000/- and costs of Rs.1,500s.

2. The brief facts of the case, according to the Petitioner who was the original Complainant before the District Forum, are that the Complainant’s husband had taken a Personal Accident Policy, covering the period 27.10.1997 to 26.10.2007, for an insured sum of Rs.2,00,000/- from the Respondent-Insurance Company. While so, on 2.12.2005, the insured had a fall in the bathroom and subsequently died due to the injuries sustained. The Complainant had informed the Insurance Comp












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top