V.K.JAIN
Sub-Division Engineer (L &B), Telecom Distt. B. S. N. L. – Appellant
Versus
M. Sambasiva Rao – Respondent
V.K. Jain, Presiding Member—No one is present for the respondent despite service. On last date of hearing also no one was present either for the petitioner or for the respondent despite service of notice on the petitioners. The advocate who was representing the petitioners has expired and intimation in this regard was given to this Commission by a counsel on the last date of hearing. In these circumstances, when no one is appearing either for the petitioners or for the respondent despite service of notice on them, I proceed to decide the revision petition on its merits.
2. The petitioners allegedly allotted a staff quarter to the complainant on out of turn basis and the said quarter was occupied by him on 18-02-2005. The license fee for the aforesaid quarter was to be deducted from the salary of the complainant. On 22-02-2005 the servant quarter was allegedly locked by the petitioners on the ground that the allotment made to the complainant had been cancelled. Being aggrieved the complainant approached the concerned District Forum seeking the following reliefs:
(a) to handover the keys and redeliver the possession of the staff quarter bearing No.B-2, Type-II to the compl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.