SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
D.K. Jain, President, Vinay Kumar, Member, Mrs. M. Shreesha, Member
Mansingh & Ors. —Petitioners
versus
ICICI General Insurance Co. Ltd. —Respondent
Revision Petition Nos.2058 to 2130 of 2014
Decided on 26.5.2015

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. R. K. Bhawnani, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Vishnu Mehra, Advocate

IMPORTANT POINT
Claims of complainants should be decided on the basis of nearest IMD data of relevant period.

Headnote:Consumer Protection Act, 1986—Sections 15, 17, 19 and 21—Insurance—Pilot Weather Based Crop Insurance Scheme for Rabi 2008-09—Matter concerning implementation of Scheme in relation to wheat crop in Durg District in Rabi 2008-09 crop season It is alleged in complaint petitions that OP/Insurance Company has provided a manipulated chart and shows by lowering low rise in temperature—Complainants had prayed that insurance claims should be paid as policy condition of rise in temperature in this period is fulfilled—Insurance claims have been disallowed on ground of a very narrow gap between recorded and requisite levels of rise in temperatures—Fora below have taken concurrent view in favour of acceptability of NCMSL data—Claims of complainants should be decided on the basis of nearest IMD data of relevant period. (Paras 3, 10, 12 and 13)

       Result : Revision petitions allowed.

ORDER

In the rainfed areas of agriculture in India, the farmer finds himself completely at the mercy of the elements. Survival of the crop is crucially dependent upon availability of the requisite moisture and ambient temperature, all through the agricultural operations from sowing to harvest. Fluctuations beyond limited tolerance levels, almost always prove fatal to survival of the crop. Even when the farmer is lucky with the quality of the seeds, pesticides micronutrients and other inputs, the growth and yield can still be destroyed by a long dry spell, temperature variations or excessive rain and flooding. In this background, Government of India and the Government of Chhattisgarh brought out an imaginative scheme under the caption Pilot Weather Based Crop Insurance Scheme for Rabi 2008-09. The notification issued by the State Government on 22.10.2008 gives details of this scheme. Being a Pilot Scheme, it is meant for a few crops and a few Districts only. Benefit under the Scheme is limited to non-loanee farmers. The Scheme is designed to be implemented through OP/ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd.

2. The Scheme is for implementation on area approach basis. Insurance premium for the same is to be borne in equal proportion by the Central and State Governments. Assessment of loss is to be made on fortnightly basis for damage suffered due to variation in average temperature and unseasonal rain. Under the Scheme the OP/ICICI Lombard is totally responsible for establishing and operating weather centres for monitoring of the temperature and rain parameters for the purposes of determination of loss.

3. The matter in these 73 Revision Petitions before us arose from implementation of this Scheme in relation to wheat crop in Durg District in Rabi 2008-09 crop season. Complaints were filed before District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg alleging that neither the claims were settled nor the details of temperature record relied upon were shared with them. Therefore, the Complainant had relied upon the data obtained from Indian Meteorological Department (IMD). Durg, District does not have an IMD monitoring station and therefore, temperature records of IMD Raipur for the period 1.1.2009 to 31.3.2009 have been relied upon by the Complainants. As per the Complaint Petition, daily variations in increase of temperature, as compared to the bench mark figures of the OP, are higher than the figures relied upon by the OP/Insurance Company. It is alleged in the complaint petitions that the OP/Insurance Co, has provided a ‘manipulated chart and shows by lowering the low rise in temperature’. The Complainants had therefore prayed that insurance claims should be paid as the policy condition of rise in temperature in this period is fulfilled.

4. In response to the above allegation in the Complaint, OP/ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company filed a very brief and non-detailed Written Statement before the District Forum, which reads as follows:-

“The Non-applicant ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company submits written statement as under:-

1. That, as per the statement of para 1 & 2 of application this applicant is having weather policy, policy no.407183 effective between the date 01/01/2009 to 31/03/2009 issued as per terms and condition of policy for which applicant insured had paid Rs.1260 to Insurance Company for 20 unit purchased at the rate of Rs.63 per Unit. The non applicant denies that on increase of temperature the compensation of Rs.3750/- is to be paid and also denies the rest statement in the absence of information and documents the applicant himself have to prove by present authentic documents the application had not qualified for the compensation as per terms and condition of policy hence the claim denied. The non applicant insurance company has rightly rejected the claim is not giving any false statement and excuse for non payment of compensation.

2. That the statement of para 3 and 4 is denied in the absence of informat



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top