K.S. Chaudhari, Presiding Member—This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner against order dated, 06-04-2011 passed by the learned State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab (in short, ‘the State Commission’), in First Appeal No. 1375/2005 – Tarlok Singh Vs. Fortis Heart Institute & Multi Speciality Hospital & Anr. by which while allowing appeal partly order of District Forum dismissing complaint was set aside and compensation was awarded.

2. Brief facts of the case are that complainant/respondent approached opposite party/petitioner hospital on 22-12-2002 for treatment and deposited Rs.1,50,000/-. Angiography was performed on 25-12-2002 and later on doctors advised that operation has to be conducted and demanded another amount of Rs. 1 lakh which was deposited. It was further submitted that on 28-12-2002 complainant was operated and it was told to him that one stent was inserted in one of the arteries and complainant was discharged on 05-01-2003. After discharging, on account of pain, complainant approached PGI, Chandigarh and doctors of the hospital apprised him that opposite party has not provided complete record. It was further submitted that CD of ang