SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

D.K.JAIN, VINAY KUMAR, M.SHREESHA
Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sandeep Joshi – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. S.M. Tripathi, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. M.S. Rohilla, Advocate

ORDER

M. Shreesha, Member—Challenge in this Revision Petition, under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”), is to order dated 15.10.2008 passed by Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal No. 925 of 2008. By its impugned order dated 15.10.2008, the State Commission has concurred with the findings of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Barracks Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi (for short the ‘District Forum’) in CC No. 134 of 2007, by which order the District Forum allowed the Complaint and directed the Insurance Company to pay the assured amount of Rs.4,00,000/- together with compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- and costs of Rs.10,000/-.

2. Succinctly put, the brief facts in the Complaint are: that the Complainant obtained an Insurance Policy for Rs.4 lakhs for his Lancer car covering the period from 5.5.2004 to 4.5.2005. While so, on 8.6.2004, the vehicle met with an accident and the Complainant averred that he had got it repaired spending Rs.1,75,986/-. On 18.7.2004, once again,







































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top