As facts in above appeals are similar and common question of law is involved, hence, these appeals are being disposed of by this common order.

2. Above appeals have been filed by the Appellant/Opposite Parties against impugned order dated 25.6.2014, passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh UT (for short, ‘State Commission’) in Consumer Complaints No.43 and 44 of 2014 filed by Complainants/Respondents Shri Dyal Singh and Shri Gurdev Singh Badial, respectively. Case of Dyal Singh is taken as the lead case.

3. Brief facts are, that Dyal Singh is residing in United Kingdom, where he had set up his own family business. Since, both sons of the respondent joined his business, and they emerged as successful entrepreneurs, he voluntarily took retirement from his business in the year 2011. The respondent had been frequently visiting India, especially Punjab Region, where he has a number of family relatives and friends, who are based in and around Chandigarh, Mohali, Jalandhar and Delhi. In order to live his post retirement life, respondent looked for buying a residential house, in the tricity. In the meantime, respondent came to know that the Appellants had launc