AJIT BHARIHOKE
V. Satish Kanniah – Appellant
Versus
Vijayalaxmi M. Sultanpuri – Respondent
Ajit Bharihoke, Presiding Member—This revision is directed against the order of the State Commission Karnataka dated 05.01.2007 whereby the State Commission allowed the appeal preferred by the respondent complainant, set aside the order of the District Forum and ordered as under:
“14. In the result, we pass the following order:
(1) The appeal is allowed. The impugned order is set aside.
(2) The complaint filed by the complainant before the District Forum is allowed in part.
(3) The OP is directed to pay Rs.25,000/- to the complainant within two months from today. In the event if the OP fails to pay the said amount to the complainant within the stipulated period as directed above, the OP shall be liable to pay interest at 12% per annum on the said amount from the date of complaint filed before the District Forum till the date of realisation.
(4) The OP is also directed to pay Rs.2000/- to the complainant towards the costs of these proceedings.”
2. Briefly put the facts relevant for the disposal of the revision petition are that respondent filed a consumer complaint in the District Forum alleging that in September 2000, the complainant approached the opposite party for treatment
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.