Ajit Bharihoke, Presiding Member—This revision is directed against the order of the Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Patna in first appeal No.124/2008 and 132/2008 whereby the State Commission dismissed appeal No.124/2004 filed on behalf of the complainant and allowed the appeal of the opposite party dealer M/s Baby Chandna Auto Centre No.132/2008 resulting in dismissal of complaint on the ground of limitation.

2. Shorn off unnecessary details, facts relevant for the disposal of the revision petition are that Pramod Kumar Singh (since deceased) father of the petitioner filed a consumer complaint in the District Forum alleging that on being approached by opposite party No.2, Pramod Kumar Singh the late complainant purchased a tractor, cultivator and trailer from opposite party No.1. For that he took loan of Rs.2 Lakhs from opposite party No.3 bank. It is the case of the complainant that for purchase of the tractor, cultivator and trailer the complainant paid a sum of Rs.4,15,000/- in all as consideration amount in various installments. Opposite party No.1 despite of having received consideration for the tractor, cultivator and trailer, delivered the possession