J. M. Malik, Presiding Member—There is a delay of 134 days in filing the present Revision Petition. According to the complainant his appeal was dismissed on 17.09.2014. His Advocate got the copy from the Registry on 10.11.2014. The petitioner was in two minds to file the Revision Petition or a Civil Suit against the builder. His financial condition was also bad. The petitioner is a physically handicapped person, belongs to Scheduled Caste. He approached many advocates to file the Revision Petition. He could not pay fee to his Advocate Sh. Nagaraj Hoskeri. He contacted Mr. Gurudatt Anolekar of Supreme Court. He was asked to translate the Marathi papers into English language. Ultimately, his case was argued by Advocate Sh. Nagaraj Hoskeri.

2. All these excuses have left no impression upon us. The petitioner did not give even a single solid ground. The case is barred by time. This fact neatly dovetails by various authorities reported in Anshul Aggarwal v. New Okhla Industrial Development Authority, (2011) 4 CPJ 63 (SC), R.B. Ramlingam v. R.B. Bhavaneshwari, (2009) 1 CLT 188 (SC) : 2013 (4) CPR 785 (SC), Ram Lal and Others v. Rewa Coalfields Ltd. AIR 1962 Supreme Court 361, Office