These two revision petitions, RP No.4294/2007 and RP No.1146/2008, have been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugned order dated 27.11.2007, passed by the Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench at Jodhpur (for short ‘the State Commission’) in two appeals, Appeal No.570/2007, “Dharam Bir Bhatia versus Dr. Anjali Dave Tiwari,” and Appeal No.604/2007 “Dr. Anirudha Aggarwal vs. Dharam Bir Bhatia”, vide which appeal No.570/2007 was dismissed, but appeal No.604/2007 was partly accepted and the order passed by the District Forum, Jaipur on 07.03.2007, allowing a sum of Rs.28,000/- to the complainant was modified and the said sum was revised to Rs.17,000/- including Rs.3,000/- as cost of litigation.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that one Dharam Bir Bhatia filed the consumer complaint in question, saying that for the dental treatment of his dependant daughter Nitu, he took advice from OP-1/respondent Dr. Anjali Dave Tiwari and then took her to respondent-2/OP-2 Dr. Anirudh Agarwal, who started the treatment in May 2003 and continued till August 2005. He paid different sums of money to OP-2 from tim