J.M. Malik, Presiding Member— This complaint was filed in the year 1999.

2. Counsel for the parties present. Counsel for the complainant/Decree Holder, heard. Counsel for the Opp. party/Judgment Debtor, not heard.

3. This Commission, had passed the following operative order on 10.2.2010:

“For the foregoing discussion, complaint is partly allowed with direction to opposite party No.1, to deposit amount of Rs.15 lakhs along with interest @ 9% p.a., from the date of filing of complaint and costs of Rs.25,000 with this Commission, within four weeks from today. On deposit of this amount, the opposite party No.1 will be entitled to dismantle and remove the gasifier plant at their expenses, within four weeks. Deposited amount will be released in favour of the complainant by the Registry, on filing of affidavit that the gasifier plant has been removed by opposite party No.1. Complaint against opposite party No.2 against whom no relief was claimed, is dismissed”.

4. It is apparent that various opportunities were given to the Judgment Debtor, but it is not performing its part of duty and wants to delay the case, unnecessarily.

5. Vide order dated 29.7.2015, the objection petition filed by