SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.M.MALIK, S.M.KANTIKAR
Alfa Therm Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Unitech Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Saurabh Jain, Advocate

ORDER

J.M. Malik, Presiding Member—The present complaint has been filed by Alfa Therm Ltd., the complainant, through its Director, Sh. Harjot Singh Chatha, vide Board of Resolution dated 31.8.2015.

2. The facts of the present case are similar to the one decided by this Bench, in Consumer Complaint No.1183 of 2015, titled Alfa Therm Ltd. c. Unitech Ltd., on 14.10.2015, wherein the complaint was dismissed, as not maintainable. In the said case, Smt. Chatha, Director, of Alfa Therm Ltd., filed the case in the capacity of Director, on behalf of the complainant, who is the wife of Sh. Harjot Singh Chatha, the present complainant in the instant case.

3. After dismissal of the case No. 1183/2015, the present complaint has been filed by the complainant against the same Opposite Party, but through different Director, who, being the husband of the Director in the former case. The facts are altogether same, but with different Tower No., Block No., Flat No. and cost of the flat.

4. In the instant case, Sh. Harjot Singh Chatha, booked a Flat bearing No.701, Block No. HBTN Tower 16, measuring 1693 sq.ft., in the project, to be developed by the Opposite Party, Unitech Habitat, Plot No.9, Sector Pt-II











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top