V.B.GUPTA, PREM NARAIN
Harpal Arya – Appellant
Versus
Housing Board Haryana, Estate Manager – Respondent
In this revision petition filed by Petitioner/Complainant, there is challenge to impugned order dated 20.06.2007 passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, Panchkula (for short, ‘State Commission’).
2. Brief fact are, that Respondent/Opposite Party invited applications for allotment of plots in Sector-15, Sonepat. Accordingly, Petitioner applied for a plot under category of 14 Marlas @ 1,700/- per Sq. yard and deposited Rs.63,400/- as earnest money being 10% of the total cost of the plot on 22.1.2001 with respondent. The draw of lots was held on 14.3.2001. Petitioner was declared successful and was allotted plot vide letter dated 27.3.2001 but no plot number was allotted. Thereafter, allotment of plot No. 2740-C was communicated to the petitioner as per letter dated 17.09.2004, so to say after expiry of 3½ years from the date of allotment. The grievance of petitioner he being an Advocate was in need of his own house but due to delay on the part of the respondent he had taken rental accommodation in Sector-14, Sonepat. During this period, cost of plot increased @ Rs. 263/- per sq. yard over the original price @ Rs.1,700/- per sq. yard when applications for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.