SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

AJIT BHARIHOKE, REKHA GUPTA
Canara Bank – Appellant
Versus
Padmini – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rakesh Pathak, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Karthik Ashok, Advocate

ORDER :

This revision is directed against the order of the Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Thiruvananthapura (in short, “the State Commission) dated 8.2.2011 in first appeal No.565/2011.

2. Briefly stated, facts relevant for the disposal of the revision petition are that the respondent filed a consumer complaint alleging that she alongwith her relative Lalitha K.P. took a loan of Rs.2 Lakh from the petitioner bank in Kishan Credit Card Scheme in October, 2004 by mortgaging their property measuring 4.72 acres. After taking of loan a debt waiver and debt relief scheme was introduced by the Central Government. It is the case of the respondent/complainant that under the said scheme the complainant was entitled to the benefit of waiver of the amount covered under the loan with interest. However, the petitioner/opposite party instead of allowing the waiver of entire amount waived the loan amount of Rs.1 Lakh and interest thereon. The respondent/complainant requested the petitioner to waive off the entire loan but in vain. Feeling aggrieved the respondent raised a consumer dispute.

3. The opposite party in its written statement denied having committed any deficiency in s









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top