SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.S.CHAUDHARI
Transasia Bio-Medicals Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Deepak Kumar Jindal – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Anjali J. Manish, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. V.K. Agarwal, Advocate

ORDER :

K.S. Chaudhari, Presiding Member—This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 6.11.2012 passed by the learned State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, UT Chandigarh (in short, ‘the State Commission’) in Appeal No. 856 of 2007, M/s. Transasia Bio-Medicals Ltd. v. Deepak Kumar Jindal by which, while dismissing appeal, order of District Forum allowing complaint was upheld.

2. Brief facts of the case are that complainant/respondent proprietor of M/s. Deep Clinical Laboratory & ECG Centre, was running his laboratory for earning his livelihood by means of self-employment by assistance of his father and younger brother purchased Random Access Auto Analyzer from OP No.1/petitioner vide invoice dated 7.3.2005 for a sum of Rs.3,75,000 and OP installed aforesaid instrument on 2.4.2005. From the day one, instrument started giving trouble. Functioning of instrument was defective and it was brought to the notice of OP and OP tried to rectify defects, but could not succeed. On 3.11.2005, OP replaced old defective syringe with new one and in November, 2005, again replaced defective Teflon Tip with new one; even then, instrument was not working properly























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top