SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.S.CHAUDHARI
Anand Kumar Dwivedi – Appellant
Versus
Jha Associates (Reg. ) – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Sharma, Advocate

ORDER

K.S. Chaudhari, Presiding Member—This appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 15.10.2015 passed by the learned State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi (in short, ‘the State Commission’) in Complt. Case No. 383/2015 – Anand Kumar Dwivedi Vs. M/s. Jha Associates (Reg.) & Ors. by which, complaint was dismissed at admission stage.

2. Brief facts of the case are that Complainant/Appellant was approached by OP No. 2 to 5/Respondent No. 2 to 5, who are developers and dealers engaged in business of real estate representing their venture, a well-developed colony in the name and style of ‘Kadi Vihar’ with all amenities and facilities and complainant booked one plot of 65 sq. yds. for a sale consideration of Rs.11,05,000/-. Complainant made payment of full sale consideration and OP executed agreement to sell and purchase general power of attorney and receipt, but OP has not developed land for colony with basic facilities and has not executed sale deed. Alleging deficiency on the part of OP, complainant filed complaint for direction to provide all facilities and to execute and get sale deed registered or in the alternate to refund double of the sale consi








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top