J.M. Malik, Presiding Member—Present none. Case is called thrice. Our Court Master informed us that the counsel for the petitioners came during the lunch time. Consequently, we are waiting for him. This is exactly 4:00 P.M. but none has appeared.

2. This order will decide the above two cases. These two cases were fixed for arguments for admission. These cases have been filed second time. Our previous order in the first revision petitions bearing numbers 2736/2015 & 2737/2015 dated 02-12-2015 is reproduced as here under:

“Learned counsel for the petitioner present. Arguments heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw both these revision petitions.

Permission granted.

Both the revision petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.”

3. It is not understood how these cases have been filed and under what authority. No permission was granted for filing the cases again. The cases were dismissed as withdrawn as per the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri R. D. Sontakke. These revision petitions are filed by one Shri N.B. Bhagat, Advocate, who is not present.

4. In case Kalpana Roy Vs. The Branch Manager, Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. &