SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

V.K.JAIN, B.C.GUPTA
Trevor D’lima – Appellant
Versus
Fortune Infrastructure – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants:Shri Sukumar Pattjoshi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Somesh Kr. Dubey and Mr. Vikas Nautiyal, Advocates
For the Opp.Party Nos.1 & 2: Nemo
For the Opp.Party Nos.3 & 4:Ms. Savita Mundra, Advocate

ORDER (ORAL)

V.K. Jain, Presiding Member—Vide allotment letter dated 15.10.2011, OP No.1 which at that time was known as Hicon Infrastructure, allotted flat bearing No.202 on the second floor in ‘A’ Wing of a building which it was proposing to construct at C.T.S No.F/1116-A Village Bandra, St. Martin Road, Bandra (W), Mumbai. The proposed building was to be known as Hicons Onyx. The area of the flat sold to the complainants was to be 828.40 sq.ft. of usable carpet area inclusive of balcony and dry balcony. The total consideration of the flat was fixed at Rs.1,93,00,000/- out of which Rs.20 lakhs were paid as Earnest Money Deposit. The balance amount of Rs.1,73,00,000/- was payable in the following manner:-

 

Payment Due On

Amount due

1

On or before 25.10.2011

35,00,000/-

2

On or before 28.10.2011

20,00,000/-

3

On or before 04.11.2011

35,00,000/-

4

On or before 16.11.2011

35,00,000/-

5

On or before 30.11.2011

28,00,000/-

6

On or before 20.12.2011

20,00,000/-

 

Total Amount

1,73,00,000/-

2. It was agreed






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top