V.B. Gupta, Presiding Member—Appellants/Complainants have preferred this appeal under Section 19 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short, ‘Act’) against impugned order dated 29.08.2008, passed by A.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad, in C.D. No.40 of 2003, vide which complaint filed by appellants was dismissed.

2. Brief facts are, that Respondent No.1/Opposite Party No.1 (R-1) is a proprietary concern and Dr.M.Padmanabh Reddy its sole proprietor. Respondent No.2/Opposite Party No.2-Hospital (R-2) is owned, managed and administered by R-1. Respondent No.3/Opposite Party No.3 (R-3) is Assistant Professor working in Government Maternity Hospital, Nayapool and also attends R-2 hospital as Consultant Obstetrician and Gynecologist. Respondent No.4/Opposite Party No.4 (R-4) was working as resident Obstetrician and Gynecologist in R-2, hospital. Respondents No.5 & 6/Opposite Parties No.5 & 6 (R-5 and 6) are Consultant Anesthesiologists of R-2, hospital. Respondent No.7/Opposite Party No.7 is the Insurance Company.

3. Appellant No.1 (A-1) is husband of dec