Mrs. M. Shreesha, Presiding Member—Challenge in these two Revision Petitions bearing Nos. 3540/2008 and 3874/2008 filed by the Complainant and the Hospital respectively, under Section 21-b of the Consumer Protection Act (for short “the Act”), are to the Appeals bearing No. 362 and 339 of 2004 respectively on the file of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan, Jaipur (for short “the State Commission”). By the impugned order the State Commission partly allowed the Appeal of the Complainant and directed the Opposite Party Hospital to pay compensation to the Complainant of Rs.2,00,000/- and further directed that out of the same, a fixed deposit of Rs.75,000/- to be made in name of each of the children for the period till they attained majority. However, the Appeal preferred by the Hospital was dismissed.

2. The brief facts stated in the complaint are that:-

The Complainant’s wife was treated in the Opposite Party Hospital and had undergone tests on 01.06.1998, 24.07.1998, 31.07.1998, 15.09.1998, 26.09.1998 and 10.10.1998. The Complainant pleaded that sonography and the relevant urine and blood tests were done and on 13.10.1998 the Patient was admitted in the H