K.S. Chaudhari, Presiding Member—This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 06.12.2011 passed by the Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Panchkula (in short, ‘the State Commission’) in Appeal No. 627 of 2004 – HUDA & Anr. Vs. S.M. Chopra by which, while allowing appeal, order of District Forum allowing complaint was set aside.

2. Brief facts of the case are that Complainant/petitioner filed complaint before District Forum against OP/respondent and learned District Forum vide order dated 23.12.2003 allowed complaint and following directions were given :

“1. The respondents are ordered to overhaul the account of the complainant in a manner that the respondents will charge only 7% simple interest from the complainant that too with effect from 11.4.77 – the date of offering of physical possession of the plot in question. The respondents will also not charge any penalty, extension fee till 11.4.77 from the date of allotment of the plot in question.

2. The respondents are also ordered to pay interest on the deposit of the complainant on the same rate as mentioned above w.e.f. from deposit till the delivery of the possession of th