SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.S.CHAUDHARI
Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
K. Latha – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Lenin Singh Hijam, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Bineesh K., Advocate

ORDER

K.S. Chaudhari, Presiding Member—This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 11.05.2012 passed by the Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Thiruvananthapuram (in short, ‘the State Commission’) in Appeal No. 652 of 2011 – Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. K. Latha by which, order of District Forum allowing complaint was modified.

2. Brief facts of the case are that complainant/respondent is running pig farm and for this purpose she purchased Bajaj Goods Auto with financial assistance from OP No. 1/Petitioner to the tune of Rs.1,06,000/- during May, 2007 and loan amount was payable in 36 monthly installments from 5.5.2007. Complainant was prompt in making payment of installments yet on 25.6.2009 OP No. 2/Petitioner No.2 with the help of others deputed by OP No. 1 forcibly took away vehicle. Alleging deficiency on the part of OP, complainant filed complaint before District forum. OP resisted complaint, admitted grant of loan, but denied that complainant was making regular payment of installments but submitted that complainant was habitual defaulter in making payment of installments. It was further submitted that vehic












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top