SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

V.K.JAIN
Arun Datta – Appellant
Versus
Unitech Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Opp.Parties:Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate

ORDER

V.K. Jain, Presiding Member—The complainants, who are father and son, booked a residential flat with the opposite party-Unitech Limited on 20.06.2011 paying a sum of Rs.8 Lakhs by way of a cheque. A Flat No.F-00-0060 in Anthea Floors, Wildflower Country, Gurgaon was allotted to the complainants and the parties entered into Buyer’s Agreement dated 12.12.2011 incorporating their respective obligations. The total sale consideration of the flat was agreed at Rs.1,52,10,514/- and the complainants have so far made the following payments to the opposite party:

Dated

Cheque No.

Amount (Rs.)

20/06/2011

20/06/2011

482456

01/09/2011

01/09/2011

763484

16/09/2011

16/09/2011

763485

16/09/2011

16/09/2011

763486

19/10/2011

19/10/2011

763487

19/10/2011

19/10/2011

763490

06/01/2014

06/01/2014

000014

2. As per Clause 4(a) of the Buyer’s Agreement, possession of the flat was agreed to be delivered within 36 months thereof. The opposite party however had a grace period of three months to deliver



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top