Dr. B.C. Gupta, Presiding Member — The opposite parties (OPs) M/s. Sahara City Homes (Sahara Prime City Ltd.) and Ors. have filed this appeal against the impugned order dated 10.07.2005, passed by the U.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Lucknow, (hereinafter referred to as “the State Commission”) in Consumer Complaint No. 97/2014, Mohd. Najam Khan & Anr. Vs. Sahara City Homes (Sahara Prime City Ltd.) & Ors., filed by the present respondents, vide which, the said complaint was allowed and the appellants were directed to hand over the possession of the flat in question, after obtaining the balance amount payable from the complainants. It was also stated that if the said flat had not been completed, then some other flat of same value and size should be allotted to the complainants.

2. The facts of the case are that the complainant no. 1, Mohd. Nazab Khan, who is a handicapped person and the complainant no. 2, Smt. Shagoofa Naaz booked a three bedroom apartment with the OPs and they were allotted unit no. C-25/105, first floor, having an area of 158.41 sq. mtr. at a total cost of Rs. 45,70,000/- at Sahara City Homes, Lucknow. It has been stated that the complainants