SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.K.JAIN
Sidhmukh Flexible Packaging Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Dr. P.K. Agrawal, Advocate

ORDER

V.K. Jain, Presiding Member—The complainant is a private limited company engaged in the manufacturing of plastic packaging film. The complainant allegedly entered into an arrangement with the opposite party State Bank of India for obtaining term loan of Rs. 6.28 Crores and a working capital of Rs. 2 Crores. According to the complainant, the bank disbursed Rs. 1.47 Crores against the agreed working capital of Rs. 2 Crores and term loan of Rs. 5.60 Crores to it. A fire broke out in the factory of the complainant in the night intervening 14/15.02.2004, resulting in loss of several assets. The claim for reimbursement of the said loss was settled by the insurer for a full and final payment of Rs. 8.69 Crores and the said amount was paid to the bank, against the discharge voucher executed by it.

2. The complainant is now alleging excess adjustment of Rs. 3.38 Crores by the bank and claiming the said amount from it. The break-up of the alleged excess adjustment is as under:-

1.

Claim of excess interest charged by SBI

Rs. 80,23,000

2.

Claim of loss of interest due to













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top