IA/4924 to 4926/2016 (Directions)

V.K. Jain, Presiding Member—The learned counsel for the complainants submits that the opposite party despite knowing that Writ Petition which it had filed before the Punjab and Haryana High Court had been dismissed before the written version came to be filed by it, concealed the aforesaid fact while filing its written version, thereby giving an impression that the said Writ Petition was still pending. The learned counsel for the opposite party, however, submits that it was an inadvertent omission not to refer to the dismissal of the Writ Petition while filing the written version. He has pointed out that the factum of the dismissal of the Writ Petition and filing of an appeal against the order dismissing the Writ Petition has been duly disclosed in the affidavit filed by the opposite party by way of evidence. Considering all the facts and circumstances including that the factum of the dismissal of the Writ Petition was disclosed in the affidavit filed by way of evidence, I do not deem it appropriate to initiate any action against the opposite party or its directors for the aforesaid omission. The applications are, therefore, dismissed.

CC/1232/20