SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

REKHA GUPTA, ANUP K THAKUR
HUDA – Appellant
Versus
Sandeep Kumar – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Piyush Hans, Mr. Piyush Hans, Advocates
For the Respondents:Mr. Gagan Gupta, Advocate

ORDER

Mrs. Rekha Gupta, Presiding Member—The present revision petition no. 1446 of 2010 has been filed against the judgment dated 31.07.2009 of the Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Panchkula (‘the State Commission’) in First Appeal no. 1016 of 2005.

2. Briefly stated facts relevant for the disposal of the present revision petition are that the complainants/ respondents Sandeep Singla and Satish Singla purchased the SCO Complex no. 42 at Old Judicial Complex, Gurgaon, in an open auction on 20.08.2001 with the condition to pay 75% of the payment in eight half yearly instalments. The respondents took the possession of the plot on 20.09.2001. The allegations of the respondents are that the petitioner/ opposite parties had not provided the basic facilities/ civil amenities like water and electricity at the SCO Complex. They therefore prayed that:

• Appropriate orders directing the petitioners to make / refund the payment of interest charged by the petitioner on instalments paid with 18% interest and the interest on balance instalment / future payments be waived with a direction to the petitioner to provide the basic amenities like water, electricity and sewerage conne




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top