SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.S.CHAUDHARI
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sundent India – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Ms. Sunanda Nimisha, Advocate

ORDER

K.S. Chaudhari, Presiding Member—This appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 20th September, 2016 passed by the Learned State Commission in Complaint No. 1102 of 2015 – Sundent India Vs. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors., by which opposite party no. 1 was proceeded ex-parte.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the complainant/respondent no. 1 filed complaint before State Commission against appellant/opposite party no. 1 along with two other opposite parties. Opposite party no. 1 filed Vakalatnama on 05-07-2016 but none appeared on 20th September, 2016 and was proceeded ex-parte and on the same day right to file written statement of opposite party no. 1 was also closed as written statement was not filed within stipulated period, against which this appeal has been filed along with application for condonation of delay.

3. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused record.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed application for condonation of delay in which it was mentioned that counsel for the appellant came to know about impugned order on 29-09-2016 as wrong date was noted and appeal was prepared in third week of October, 2016 w







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top