SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

B.C.GUPTA, S.M.KANTIKAR
Krishna Kunj – Appellant
Versus
Rabindra Nath Basu – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Partha Sil, Advocate with Mr. Tavish B. Prasad and Ms. Preeti Shukla, Advocates

ORDER

Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member—M/s. Krishna Kunj, (opposite party No.1/petitioner) being a builder agreed to sell the flat in question at Rs.14,50,000/- at the rate of Rs.2,000/- per sq.ft.. The complainants have already paid Rs.12,59,000/- as per agreement of sale, and the balance amount of Rs.1,92,000/- was to be paid on the date of execution of the deed of conveyance, but the opposite party No.1 failed to keep his promise and demanded enhanced price at Rs.2,500/- per sq. ft. from the complainants. Thus, the complainants, Mr. Rabindranath Basu and Mrs. Manju Basu, filed the complaint before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal on the allegation that inspite of agreement of sale dated 31-05-2010 between them and opposite party No.1, M/s. Krishan Kunj, the developer is not executing and registering the sale deed of the flat, and hence, the opposite party be directed to execute and register deed of conveyance and to deliver possession, to pay Rs.5,50,000/- as compensation for mental agony and harassment and to pay Rs.50,000/- towards enhanced cost of registration, along with Rs.20,000/- as litigation cost.

2. The State Commission after considering the mater





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top