Dr. B.C. Gupta, Presiding Member—These two revision petitions filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 have arisen out of the impugned order dated 28.02.2006, passed by the Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as ‘the State Commission’) in Appeal No. 794/2005, “M/s. Gati Limited Vs. M/s. Synergetic Automation Technologies”, vide which, while partly allowing the said appeal, the order dated 18.08.2005, passed by the District Forum New Delhi in consumer complaint No. 406/2005, filed by the present respondent, allowing the said complaint, was modified.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the complainant M/s. Synergetic Automation Technologies, booked a parcel of goods with the opposite party (OP), M/s. Gati Limited at Ghaziabad, U.P. on 26.06.99 for delivery at Bhopal, M.P. to M/s. Pacific Marketing as per invoice 0120 (Challan No. 009, dated 26.06.99). The value of the goods was Rs.1,73,521.92/-. It has been alleged in the consumer complaint that the OP M/s. Gati Ltd. failed to bring receipt from the consignee and hand over the same to the complainant in token of the consignee having accepted the said go