SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.C.GUPTA, PREM NARAIN
Suer, Housefed – Appellant
Versus
Anu Singla – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. D.V. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sukhbeer Singh, Advocate

ORDER

Dr. B.C. Gupta, Presiding Member—This first appeal has been filed under section 19 read with section 21(a)(ii) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugned interim order dated 08.08.2016, passed by the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as ‘the State Commission’) in consumer complaint No. 21/2016, vide which, the Appellant/OP has been denied the opportunity to file their written reply to the consumer complaint, filed by the present respondent on the ground that the appellant/OP failed to file the said reply within the period stipulated under section 13 of the Act.

2. The learned counsel for the appellant has been heard in detail. The record of the State Commission was also called and has been examined.

3. The respondent/complainant Anu Singla filed the consumer complaint No. 21/2016 against the appellant/OP, alleging delay and deficiency in service on the part of the appellant/OP in handing over the flat booked by her in their housing project. She demanded physical possession of the flat in good condition alongwith compensation, or to refund the money deposited by her alongwith interest. The said complaint was heard by th






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top