B.C.GUPTA, PREM NARAIN
Harinder Singh Dhall – Appellant
Versus
Sahara Prime City Ltd. – Respondent
Dr. B.C. Gupta, Presiding Member—This revision petition has been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugned order dated 2.11.2015, passed by the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as ‘the State Commission’) in Appeal No. 951/2015, “Harinder Singh Dhall Vs. Sahara Prime City Ltd.”, vide which, while dismissing the said appeal, the order dated 23.07.2015 passed by the District Forum, Ludhiana in consumer complaint No. 843/11.12.2014, dismissing the said complaint, was upheld.
2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the complainant/petitioner Harinder Singh Dhall filed a consumer complaint against the OP Builder, Sahara Prime City Limited, saying that in response to their advertisement in the newspaper, he booked a three-bedroom flat at Jaipur, with area about 135.95 sq. mtr. vide application dated 14.02.2006 and made payment of the total demanded amount of Rs.27,08,175/-. The complainant alleged that when he went to Jaipur city to verify the situation of the property, he was shocked to see that there was no construction at all. On taking up the matter with the OP company, a sum of Rs.35
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.