SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.C.GUPTA, PREM NARAIN
Harinder Singh Dhall – Appellant
Versus
Sahara Prime City Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant: In Person

ORDER

Dr. B.C. Gupta, Presiding Member—This revision petition has been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugned order dated 2.11.2015, passed by the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as ‘the State Commission’) in Appeal No. 951/2015, “Harinder Singh Dhall Vs. Sahara Prime City Ltd.”, vide which, while dismissing the said appeal, the order dated 23.07.2015 passed by the District Forum, Ludhiana in consumer complaint No. 843/11.12.2014, dismissing the said complaint, was upheld.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the complainant/petitioner Harinder Singh Dhall filed a consumer complaint against the OP Builder, Sahara Prime City Limited, saying that in response to their advertisement in the newspaper, he booked a three-bedroom flat at Jaipur, with area about 135.95 sq. mtr. vide application dated 14.02.2006 and made payment of the total demanded amount of Rs.27,08,175/-. The complainant alleged that when he went to Jaipur city to verify the situation of the property, he was shocked to see that there was no construction at all. On taking up the matter with the OP company, a sum of Rs.35





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top