SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

AJIT BHARIHOKE, ANUP K.THAKUR
Apex Buildtech Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Madhu Talreja – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate

ORDER (ORAL)

Ajit Bharihoke, Presiding Member—The petitioner being aggrieved of the concurrent finding of the State Commission, Delhi in F.A. No.18.10.2016 resulting in dismissal of her appeal has approached this Commission in revision petition.

2. Briefly stated facts relevant for the disposal of this revision petition are that the respondent/complainant booked a residential flat in the group housing project “Apex Greens” at NH-1, GT Road, Sonipat, Haryana, undertaken by the petitioner/OP. The respondent pursuant to the agreement deposited Rs.10 Lakhs with the OP against the consideration amount through two cheques respectively dated 20.02.2006 and 25.12.2006. Builder Buyer Agreement between the parties was executed on 20.10.2007. It is the case of the complainant that at the time of executing the agreement, the petitioner/OP assured her that possession of flat would be handed over within three years. The builder faulted to deliver possession within the promised time. The respondent/complainant therefore requested the petitioner to refund the amount of Rs.10 Lakhs deposited by her at the time of booking of the flat. She served a legal notice to the appellant but no avail. Thereafter


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top