SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

V.K.JAIN
Ricky Chandra – Appellant
Versus
Sudeep Ghosh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Sanjoy Kumar Ghosh, Advocate with Ms. Rupali S. Ghosh, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Barun Prasad, Advocate

ORDER (ORAL)

V.K. Jain, Presiding Member—The complainant/respondent allegedly entered into an agreement with the petitioner for purchase of a residential flat, admeasuring 1210 square ft. of super built area, to be situated on the third floor, southern side of the building to be constructed by the appellant at 15A, Chetla Road, Kolkata, with one covered car parking. A sum of Rs.2,40,000/- was paid by the complainant/respondent to the appellant on 22.07.2009 followed by payment of identical amount on 12.08.2009 for which two receipts were executed by the appellant. This is also the case of the complainant/respondent that the following was the payment schedule agreed between the parties:-

 

Payment Schedule

 

10%

Booking amount (on cheque amount i.e. 24 lacs

Rs.2,40,000

10%

Balance Booking amount (on or before 10-8-2009)

Rs.2,40,000

 

Cash to be paid before agreement for sale (within 30.11.2010)

Rs.16,25,000

10%

Foundation work

Rs.2,40,000

15%

1st floor casting

Rs.3,60,000

15%

2nd floor casting

Rs.3,60,000

15%

3rd floor casting

Rs.3,60,
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top