SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

D.K.JAIN, M.SHREESHA
Janta Land Promoters Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Anil Kumar Mittal – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Sudhir Kumar Gupta and Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Samarth Sagar, Advocate

ORDER

D.K. Jain, President—This Revision Petition by a Real Estate Developer, namely, M/s Janta Land Promoters Pvt. Ltd., the sole Opposite Party in the Complaint, is directed against the order dated 09.01.2017, passed by the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Chandigarh (for short “the State Commission”) in First Appeal No. 873 of 2016. By the impugned order, the State Commission has affirmed the order dated 24.10.2016, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, SAS Nagar, Mohali (for short “the District Forum”) in Complaint Case No. 13 of 2015. By the said order, while accepting the Complaint filed by the Respondent/Complainant, alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practices by the Petitioner herein in deducting 10% of the total amount of Rs.40,41,519/-, deposited by the Complainant as far back as in the year 2012, the District Forum had directed the Petitioner to refund the amount so deducted, i.e. Rs.14,30,029/-, along with interest @ 12% per annum w.e.f. 17.12.2013 till actual payment and also pay to the Complainant a sum of Rs.25,000/- as compensation for the mental agony caused to him, along with costs, quantified at Rs.5,000/-.








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top