Sunanda Dhananjay Lahoti VS Metlife India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

K.S.CHAUDHARI
Sunanda Dhananjay Lahoti – Appellant
Versus
Metlife India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Vatsalya Vigya and Mr. Rajat Kapoor, Advocates
For the Respondents:Mr. D. Varadarjan, Advocate

ORDER

K.S. Chaudhari, Presiding Member—These appeals arise out of single order of State Commission, hence decided by common order.

2. These appeals have been filed by appellant against order dated 13.5.2014 passed by State Commission in Complainant No. 33 of 2011-Smt. Sunanda W/o Dhananjay Lahoti v. The Metlife India Insurance Company Limited & Anr. and Complaint No. 34 of 2011-Smt. Sunanda W/o Dhananjay Lahoti v. The Metlife India Insurance Company Limited & Anr., by which complaints were dismissed.

3. Brief facts of the cases are that the complainant’s husband Dhananjay Lahoti, who expired on 29.6.2010, obtained two insurance policies from the opponent Insurance Company-R-1 having its office at Aurangabad i.e. from opponent No. 2/R-2, the details of which are given as under:

Sr. No.	Policy No	Date of policy proposal	Period of Policy	Maturity amount	Annual premium
1.	20289891	14.3.2010	27.3.2010 to 27.3.2035	60,00,000	Rs. 6,00,000
2.	20353447	26.5.2010	27.5.2010 to 27.5.2020	50,00,000	Rs. 25,953.59

he opponent Insurance Company had

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

K.S.CHAUDHARISunanda Dhananjay Lahoti – AppellantVersusMetlife India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

K.S.CHAUDHARI
Sunanda Dhananjay Lahoti – Appellant
Versus
Metlife India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent