SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

AJIT BHARIHOKE
Rishi Malhotra – Appellant
Versus
Blue Coast Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Nikhil A. Borwankar, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Advocate

ORDER

Ajit Bharihoke, Presiding Member—Rishi Malhotra an American citizen has filed the present complaint alleging that on 8.2.2013 opposite parties No. 2 & 3 entered into a tripartite agreement with the complainant to construct and transfer on lease holding basis one commercial space unit No.19-C & 22, Ground Floor, Sheraton Chandigarh Hotel, Chandigarh. As per the agreement the lease of the unit was to continue until September, 2077 and the consideration amount was Rs. 94,80,000/-. Pursuant to the agreement the complainant paid the entire consideration amount vide two cheques worth Rs.18,96,000 and Rs.75,84,000/- respectively dated 8.1.2013 and 5.2.2013. It is alleged that the possession of the property was to be handed over to the complainant within 12 months of the agreement i.e. on or before 8.2.2014. It is the case of the complainant that despite of the complainant having complied with his part of the agreement the opposite parties have failed to deliver possession of the subject unit to the complainant. It is also alleged that vide clause 41 of the tripartite agreement till the date of the first lease the complainant was to receive minimum monthly return of Rs.71,000/- w.e.f


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top