K.S. Chaudhari, Presiding Member—This revision petition has been filed by petitioners against order dated 30.3.2010 passed by State Commission in FA No. 2009/484, Anindya Mukherjee, Sole Proprietor of Adventure Mania v. Dr. (Mrs.) Dalia Roy, by which appeal was allowed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that in the month of February, 2007 the opposite party/respondent representing himself to be a travel agent of repute, made an appointment with the complainants/petitioners in a coffee shop and told that he had considerable experience in conducting trips, expeditions and excursions to Mount Kailash and Mans Sarovar. Thereafter, the opposite party met complainants for discussion the modalities of the trip. Pursuant to such representations and believing the same to be true and being convinced that superior facilities would be provided and adequate precautions would be taken to make the trip memorable and exciting, keeping in mind the age and physical ailments of the complainants they booked a trip to the aforesaid destination. Initially the complainants paid advance of Rs. 30,000 and subsequently, they paid the full cost of the trip i.e. Rs. 2,16,000 including the costs for stay, t