SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.M.KANTIKAR
Ravindra Dnyaneshwar Patil – Appellant
Versus
Vinay Tule – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Yogesh Mandpe, Advocate

ORDER

Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Presiding Member—The instant appeal is filed by the appellants/complainants, Mr. Ravindra Dnyaneshwar Patil (Complainant No. 1/Appellant No. 1) and his wife Mrs. Sangeeta (Complainant No. 2/Appellant No. 2) against the impugned order dated 3.5.2017 passed in Complaint Case No. CC/15/13 whereby Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench at Nagpur (in short, ‘the State Commission’) has dismissed the complaint filed against Dr. Vinay Tule, the OP.

2. The brief facts relevant for the disposal of the appeal are that the complainants, an educated couple, carry Sickle Cell disease, a blood disorder. They have one son aged about 10 years. Complainant No. 2 conceived for second pregnancy and due to apprehension of Sickle Cell disease, (SS Pattern) to the foetus, the couple consulted Dr.Bharati Taori , a Obstetrics and Gynaecologist at Sneh Nursing Home, Nagpur. To rule out the possibility of any SS blood disorder to the foetus, she advised the complainant No 2 to undergo a pre-natal diagnosis by DNA test. It was 3rd month of pregnancy. Dr. Taori collected the Chorionic Villus Biopsy (CVB) sample from the womb of Complainant No.2 and sent

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top