SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

REKHA GUPTA
Mohinder Poddar – Appellant
Versus
ESI Corporation – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. B.K. Mishra, Advocate

ORDER

Rekha Gupta, Presiding Member—The present revision petition has been filed against the judgment dated 09.06.2016 of the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh (‘the State Commission’) in First Appeal no. 858 of 2015.

2. The facts of the case as per the petitioner/ complainant are that the petitioner, in his complaint, has alleged that he was working as a Sweeper with respondent no.6, i.e. M/s Bajaj Sons Ltd. and the ESI deductions were being made from his salary. His Insurance number was 2609459034. On 04.08.2011, while coming out of the factory while going to his house, he suffered an accident in the course of his employment and suffered injuries on his left leg and left shoulder. He was not in his senses and was taken to the hospital by the passers-by and was admitted in Civil Hospital, Ludhiana, and thereafter was admitted in ESI Hospital, Ludhiana, on 05.08.2011. On 13.08.2011, the petitioner was referred to Mediciti, which refused to treat him and he got himself admitted in Military Hospital, Jalandhar, and thereafter was shifted to Delhi. There was no treatment available at that place and, as such, he was got admitted in Amandeep Hospital, Amrit



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top