Ajit Bharihoke, Presiding Member—No one appears on behalf of respondent No.1 even on the third call. No one appears on behalf of respondent No.2 despite service of notice, even on the third call. Respondents are, therefore, proceeded ex-parte.

2. Heard. In view of the reason given in the application, delay in filing of revision petition is condoned.

3. This revision is directed against the order of the State Commission Rajasthan dated 20.07.2017 in Appeal No. 55/2016.

4. Facts relevant for the disposal of the revision petition are that vehicle no. RJ-31UA-2101 belonging to the respondent complainant was insured with the petitioner opposite party. The IDV of the vehicle was Rs.6,55,500/-. During the subsistence of the insurance policy, the vehicle met with an accident resulting in substantial damage. Intimation was given to the insurance company. The complainant was advised to get the vehicle repaired. It is the case of the complainant that he spent sum of Rs.3,13,174/- on the repair of the vehicle but the petitioner insurance company sanctioned the claim for Rs.1,28,618/- and refused to pay the balance amount of Rs.1,84,450/-. Claiming this to be deficiency in service, the re