SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

B.C.GUPTA
Tricity Autos – Appellant
Versus
Subhash Chand – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Sukaam Gupta, Advocate

ORDER

Dr. B.C. Gupta, Member—This revision petition has been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugned order dated 02.05.2016, passed by the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as ‘the State Commission’) in First Appeal No. 1292/2012, “Tricity Auto & Ors. versus Subash Chand”, vide which, while dismissing the said appeal, the order dated 06.09.2012, passed by the District Forum Mohali, allowing the consumer complaint No. 219/2012, filed by the present respondent/complainant, was upheld.

2. The facts of the case are that Subhash Chand filed the consumer complaint in question, saying that he booked a new Maruti Suzuki Swift Dezire Car with the petitioner dealer Tricity Autos by making a payment of Rs.50,000/-, as earnest money, although, the usual payment for booking amount was Rs.10,000/-. The complainant made this booking on 02.02.2012 and deposited the excess amount, as he required the said car within a short time. On 28.04.2012, the OPs asked the complainant to deposit the entire remaining amount of the car, so that the delivery of the car could be given to him. The complainant deposited a sum of Rs.












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top