B.C.GUPTA
Tricity Autos – Appellant
Versus
Subhash Chand – Respondent
Dr. B.C. Gupta, Member—This revision petition has been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugned order dated 02.05.2016, passed by the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as ‘the State Commission’) in First Appeal No. 1292/2012, “Tricity Auto & Ors. versus Subash Chand”, vide which, while dismissing the said appeal, the order dated 06.09.2012, passed by the District Forum Mohali, allowing the consumer complaint No. 219/2012, filed by the present respondent/complainant, was upheld.
2. The facts of the case are that Subhash Chand filed the consumer complaint in question, saying that he booked a new Maruti Suzuki Swift Dezire Car with the petitioner dealer Tricity Autos by making a payment of Rs.50,000/-, as earnest money, although, the usual payment for booking amount was Rs.10,000/-. The complainant made this booking on 02.02.2012 and deposited the excess amount, as he required the said car within a short time. On 28.04.2012, the OPs asked the complainant to deposit the entire remaining amount of the car, so that the delivery of the car could be given to him. The complainant deposited a sum of Rs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.