SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

D.K.JAIN, M.SHREESHA
U. T. Builders and Promoters Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Anju Mahajan – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Anant Agarwal and Ms. Charanjeet Kaur Bhatia, Advocates

ORDER

D.K. Jain, President—By this First Appeal, under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”), a Real Estate Developer, namely, M/s U.T. Builders & Promoters Ltd. (for short “the Developer”), calls in question the legality and correctness of the order dated 18.01.2016, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, U.T. Chandigarh (for short “the State Commission”) in Consumer Complaint No.203 of 2015. By the impugned order, the State Commission has partly allowed the Complaint, and directed the Developer to jointly and severally, refund the amount of Rs.22,50,000/- to the Complainant, along with interest @ 12% p.a. from the respective date of deposits, besides Rs.1,50,000/- as compensation for causing mental agony etc. and Rs.50,000/- as litigation costs, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the said order, failing which the amount as against refund shall carry penal interest @ 15% p.a. (simple), instead of interest @ 12% p.a., and the amounts as against compensation and litigation costs shall carry interest at the said enhanced rate from the date of passing of the order (i.e. 18.01.2016) till rea

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top