Ajit Bharihoke, Presiding Member—This revision is directed against the order of the State Commission Punjab dismissing the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order of the concerned District Forum in limine.

2. Briefly stated, the facts relevant for disposal for the disposal of the revision petition are that the petitioner (earlier M/s Bajaj Tempo Ltd.) is the manufacturer of the subject vehicle Cruiser Euro II.

3. It is the case of the complainant that on 16.03.2007, he purchased the subject vehicle from M/s Raj Motors, Rajpur Road, Patiala (OP No.1), the then authorized dealer of the petitioner against a bill in which the year of manufacture of the subject vehicle was mentioned as 2007.

4. That at the time of first service of the vehicle, the complainant was shocked to know that the subject vehicle was 2006 model. The complainant, thus, approached OP No.1 with a request seeking replacement of the vehicle or refund of the consideration amount Rs.5,36,000/-. OP No.1 assured the complainant that he would talk to manufacturer but the grievance of the complainant was not redressed. In October 2007, the complainant again approached OP No.1 who told that he was no more