D.K. Jain, President—Delay condoned.

2. By these two Revision Petitions, under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”), the Complainant questions the legality and correctness of the two orders both dated 14.05.2015, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana at Panchkula (for short “the State Commission”) in First Appeals No.142 and 143 of 2015. By the impugned orders, the State Commission has overturned the orders dated 14.11.2014, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Jhajjar (for short “the District Forum”) in Complaints No.48 and 76 of 2013 and has dismissed the Complaints filed by the Petitioner observing thus:—

“4. Learned counsel for HUDA has placed on record report (Annexure A-1) submitted by Executive Engineer to the Estate Officer, HUDA, Bahadurgarh, certifying that the development works such as water supply, sewerage and roads have been completed. Another report (Annexure A-2) of the Executive Engineer, Electrical Division dated January 12th, 2012 has also been relied upon wherein it is stated that electrification work, that is, LT line has already been provided in front of 949 plots and