SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PREM NARAIN
Mittal Education Society – Appellant
Versus
Indian Overseas Bank – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Nishant Datta, Advocate with Mr. Amod Sharma, Advocate

ORDER

The present complaint has been filed on behalf of the complainant society by its Secretary, Mr. Ved Mittal, who has been duly authorized by the complainant society to file the present consumer complaint. The complainant society is a registered society running a duly recognized school, namely, Queen Mary’s School.

2. The complainant society had been maintaining the following accounts with the OP’s branch at Prashant Vihar, New Delhi, from sometime around 2005:—

S. No.

Account No

Account Name/Purpose

1.

154201000024071

Mittal Education Society

2.

154201000022994

Depreciation Reserve Fund (Queen Mary’s School)

3.

15420100008610

Queen Mary’s School

4.

15420100009001

Queen’s Kindergarten

The complainant society had authorized its Secretary, Mr. Ved Mittal, and Treasurer, Mrs. Sunita Mittal, to operate the above mentioned bank accounts.

3. It is the case of the complainant that the daughter of Mr. Ved Mittal, Ms. Kavya Mittal Goyal, discovered that one Mr. Gaurav Aggarwal, a former CA/minor partner in the Chartered Accountancy Firm of Mr.

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top