SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.M.KANTIKAR
Ravi Goenka – Appellant
Versus
Sanskriti Avass Boys Hostel – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: In person
For the Respondent:Ms. Priya Kumar, Ms. Geeta Sharma and Ms. Tanya, Advocates

ORDER

This revision petition has been filed under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 14.12.2016 passed in First Appeal No. 280 of 2016 by Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur (in short, ‘the State Commission’) whereby the appeal of the petitioner/complainant was dismissed and the order of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Jaipur (in short, ‘the Distrirt Forum’) dismissing the complaint of the complainant was upheld.

2. The brief facts are that the complainant, Ravi Goenka took admission in hostel, namely, Sanskriti Avass Boys’ Hostel/OP situated in Noida. He remitted the fees in the OP’s bank account in Jaipur and also issued Post Dated Cheque (PDC) from his bank account in Jaipur. Thereafter, due to certain deficiency and wrong commitments made by OP, the complainant sought refund of his amount, which was denied by OP. Therefore, the complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum at Jaipur.

3. The OP resisted the complaint by taking a preliminary objection that the hostel is situated in Noida, the complainant had carried out all admission procedures in Noida, therefore, the complaint filed before the










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top