SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.C.GUPTA, S.M.KANTIKAR
Sehkari Awas Samiti Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Chet Ram – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Kshitij Kumar, Advocate

ORDER

Dr. B.C. Gupta, Presiding Member—This revision petition has been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugned order dated 19.07.2017, passed by the U.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as ‘the State Commission’) in First Appeal No. 270/2015, “Chet Ram & Ors. vs Adarsh Nagar Pragatisheel Sehkari Awas Samiti Ltd.”, vide which, while allowing the appeal, the order dated 05.12.2009, passed by the District Forum Ghaziabad in consumer complaint No. 1028/1998, filed by Chet Ram respondent No. 1 and 14 other complainants, dismissing all the complaints for lack of jurisdiction, was set aside. The District Forum was directed to decide all the matters in accordance with law, holding that the consumer fora had the jurisdiction to take cognisance of the complaints in question.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that 15 different complaints were filed before the District Forum by Chet Ram & Ors. (out of these 15 persons, 13 persons filed appeal before the State Commission) against the opposite party (OP) Adarsh Nagar Pragatisheel Sehkari Awas Samiti and its office bearers, alleging deficiency in service











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top