SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

V.K.JAIN
Rajni Goyal – Appellant
Versus
Supertech Limited – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Aswarya Sinha, Ms. Priyanka Sinha and Ms. Ajita Tandon, Advocates
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Shubham Agarwal, Advocate

ORDER (ORAL)

V.K. Jain, Presiding Member—The complainant booked a residential flat with the OP in a project namely ‘Capetown’ which the OP was to develop in Sector-74 of Noida. Flat No. 1606 in Tower CM4 of the aforesaid project was allotted to the complainant vide allotment letter dated 22.05.2012. The payment plan agreed between the parties reads as follows:

Installments

Inst. Date

%

Amount

At the time of booking

17.03.2012

0.00

605764.00

Within 60  days from booking

16.05.2012

0.00

2423055.00

On commencement of foundation work

17.05.2012

0.00

545188.00

Total

 

3574007.00

Installments

Inst. Date

%

Amount

On casting of basement roof slab

18.05.2012

0.00

711698.00

On casting of 4th floor roof slab

19.05.2012

0.00

711698.00

On casting of 8th floor roof slab

20.05.2012

0.00

711698.00

On casting of 12th floor roof slab

21.05.2012

0.00

711698.00

On offer of possession letter

31.10.2013

0.00

593881.00

Total

 

7014680.00

The possession of the flat was to be delivered to the complainant by Octob











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top