V.K.JAIN
Siddhant Singh Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
Vatika Ltd. – Respondent
V.K. Jain, Presiding Member—The complainants booked residential flats with the opposite party in a project namely “The Seven Lamps”, which the opposite party was to develop in Sector 82 of Gurgaon. The complainants then executed individual Apartment Buyers agreements with the opposite party on different dates, incorporating the respective obligations of the parties in respect of the said transactions. In terms of the schedule for possession contained in the said Apartment Buyers agreements, the possession was to be delivered within a period of three years from the execution of the said agreements. Computed from the date of the execution of the said agreements, the possession ought to have been delivered by 26.6.2015 in Consumer Complaint No. 1176 of 2016, by 29.11.2014 in Consumer Complaint No. 1177 of 2016, by 21.11.2015 in Consumer Complaint No. 1178 of 2016, by 24.8.2014 in Consumer Complaint No. 1179 of 2016, by 06.12.2014 in Consumer Complaint No. 1180 of 2016 and by 12.10.2014 in Consumer Complaint No. 1181 of 2016. The opposite party offered possession of the said flats to the allottees on different dates. Admittedly, no occupancy certificate had been obtained by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.